Tuesday, January 31, 2023
ISSN 2765-8767
  • Survey
  • Podcast
  • Write for Us
Daily Remedy
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, physician writer and emergency medicine physician

    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, writer and emergency medicine physician

    November 8, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    October 31, 2022
    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    October 23, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    October 23, 2022
  • Surveys

    Surveys

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    by Jay K Joshi
    December 12, 2022

    Survey Resutls

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    October 16, 2022
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, physician writer and emergency medicine physician

    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, writer and emergency medicine physician

    November 8, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    October 31, 2022
    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    October 23, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    October 23, 2022
  • Surveys

    Surveys

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    by Jay K Joshi
    December 12, 2022

    Survey Resutls

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    October 16, 2022
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
No Result
View All Result
Daily Remedy
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncertainty & Complexity

Medicine in an Age of Unreason

Quality no longer means the same thing to you or to me.

Jay K Joshi by Jay K Joshi
January 8, 2023
in Uncertainty & Complexity
0
Medicine in an Age of Unreason

Sami Salim

When pressed to define medicine through a single goal, we would default to say: improve the quality of patient lives. This definition used to be simple enough. Not anymore.

Before, a healthy lifestyle and timely clinical intervention defined a good quality of life. When the latter was needed, we assumed that more was better. If a patient developed a stroke, then we believed more interventions would lead to better outcomes. We created protocols, fashioned stroke centers, and deployed mobile technology – all to do more, faster.

When that wasn’t enough, we standardized what quality meant. We created quality surveys using questions to quantify this newfound standard of quality through metrics like quality-adjusted-life-years (QALYs). It seemed so straightforward. We would continue to advance technologically, implement the latest widgets, and measure it all through standardized quality metrics.

But there’s one problem. Eventually, we would come to a point where quality doesn’t mean the same thing to you or to me. Whereas before quality had a simple, straightforward definition, after inundating healthcare with enough of it, we find after some point that it varies significantly per person. It’s always been this way. We just chose not to believe it. We assumed quality would always converge to one standard framework. The pandemic proved us wrong.

COVID-19 made apparent what was always present in medicine. Not everyone sees quality the same way. But medicine has an insidious way of enforcing an implicit sense of conformity. And at long last, we’re finally at an impasse.

If a patient dies of a heart attack, a myocardial infarction, but was diligent in taking care of her health and compliant with her medications, then we would lament the fact that, despite her conscientious lifestyle, she passed. We see it as an abject tragedy. But if a patient dies of a similar condition, and instead exhibited an unhealthy lifestyle, then we would mix a sense of loss with a moralized sense of – “she had it coming”.

We look at quality the same way. The proof is in the words we use to describe medical care – “the nurse did everything he could” – “the doctor made all the right decisions”. So when things go right, we assume all the actions taken that led up to that result were right as well.

We presume a cause-and-effect relationship when it comes to clinical quality. Yet the road to quality is anything but straightforward. The road we thought was linear and straightforward has now curved a bit. And the veering is starting to show. Vaccine hesitancy has always been a fringe movement, but now it’s gaining mainstream acceptance. When people are asked about their vaccine status, it’s now acceptable to say – “I don’t trust it” – “they’re not being honest about the side effects”.

There are ramifications to this. When fewer people get vaccines, their overall effectiveness decreases. Vaccines work as a balance, weighing the overall benefits of herd immunity against the individual risk of getting it. With every person deciding not to get the measles vaccine, it becomes incrementally weaker for those who decide to get it, and that much easier for endemic outbreaks of measles to occur.

Quality should now be understood in the same way. It’s a balance between standardized models of care and the individual who agrees with those models.

It’s not an outcome, defined through a standard set of actions and decisions that are then implicitly followed. That paradigm is long gone. Much like how patients are open about their lack of trust in healthcare, they now feel free to express that quality means different things to different people, depending on each patient’s level of engagement with the healthcare system. Each patient creates his or her own balance.

That might appear logical enough. But through the eyes of evidence-based medicine, it’s medically unreasonable. All of healthcare hinges on the following presumptions. Data is valid because we believe it to be. The strength of evidence derives from data’s validity. And clinical protocols work because we believe in the evidence.

Sadly, these presumptions are weakening by the day and damn near emaciated. Patients no longer see clinical data as gospel, nor think of clinical decisions are absolute medical truths. They see both clinical data and decisions as factors to balance in their pursuit of their own version of clinical quality. Individual decisions to balance alongside proposed clinical care.

Medicine will have to account for the change in perceived quality of care. Since patients make medical decisions differently, they see quality as a balance. Sometimes that balance is not even. Particularly now, with America’s recent wave of populism evoking strong beliefs of individualism. It’s time we accept this shift in thinking and treat patients through this new frame of mind. After all, the better we understand how patients think of medicine, the better care we can provide care for them.

ShareTweet
Jay K Joshi

Jay K Joshi

Dr. Jay K Joshi serves as the editor-in-chief of Daily Remedy. He is a serial entrepreneur and sought after thought-leader for matters related to healthcare innovation and medical jurisprudence. He has published articles on a variety of healthcare topics in both peer-reviewed journals and trade publications. His legal writings include amicus curiae briefs prepared for prominent federal healthcare cases.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Videos

YouTube Video VVUxUDVQenU5RTFjUVFKNDY2ZlBmdFB3LmdVUm55WVpqRmNn This is a video about Elemental/Essential Frameworks of Healthcare Law

00:00 Elemental/Essential Frameworks of Healthcare Law
Load More... Subscribe

Expert vs. Lay Testimony

Visuals

NADAC (National Average Drug Acquisition Cost)

NADAC (National Average Drug Acquisition Cost)

by Jay K Joshi
January 29, 2023
0

We list the acquisition price of drugs that are covered under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program - effectively, how much does the government pay for common drugs utilized by patients on Medicaid. Drugs listed are from A-CH.  

Read more

Twitter Updates

Tweets by DailyRemedy1

Newsletter

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do

Popular

  • Letter to the Alabama Board of Medical Examiners

    Letter to the Alabama Board of Medical Examiners

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Malicious Prosecution and Fabrication of Evidence

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Prosecuting Doctors as Drug Dealers

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • My Respect for the Law

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Why Our Prescribing were for Patients’ Best Interests

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Daily Remedy

Daily Remedy offers the best in healthcare information and healthcare editorial content. We take pride in consistently delivering only the highest quality of insight and analysis to ensure our audience is well-informed about current healthcare topics - beyond the traditional headlines.

Daily Remedy website services, content, and products are for informational purposes only. We do not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. All rights reserved.

Important Links

  • Support Us
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Newsletter

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do

  • Survey
  • Podcast
  • About Us
  • Contact us

© 2023 Daily Remedy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Contrarian
    • Financial Markets
    • Innovations & Investing
    • Perspectives
    • Politics & Law
    • Trends
    • Uncertainty & Complexity
  • Podcasts
  • Surveys
    • Survey Results
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us

© 2023 Daily Remedy

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do