Monday, May 4, 2026
ISSN 2765-8767
  • Survey
  • Podcast
  • Write for Us
  • My Account
  • Log In
Daily Remedy
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
    How NADAC, WAC, and ASP Shape Drug Costs

    How NADAC, WAC, and ASP Shape Drug Costs

    April 20, 2026
    The Hidden Costs Employers Don’t See in Traditional Health Plans

    The Hidden Costs Employers Don’t See in Traditional Health Plans

    March 22, 2026
    The Impact of COVID-19 on Patient Trust

    The Impact of COVID-19 on Patient Trust

    March 3, 2026
    Debunking Myths About GLP-1 Medications

    Debunking Myths About GLP-1 Medications

    February 16, 2026
    The Future of LLMs in Healthcare

    The Future of LLMs in Healthcare

    January 26, 2026
    The Future of Healthcare Consumerism

    The Future of Healthcare Consumerism

    January 22, 2026
  • Surveys

    Surveys

    Public Perception of Peptide Regulation and Compounding Practices

    Public Perception of Peptide Regulation and Compounding Practices

    April 19, 2026
    Understanding of Clinical Evidence in Peptide and Hormone Use

    Understanding of Clinical Evidence in Peptide and Hormone Use

    March 30, 2026

    Survey Results

    Can you tell when your provider does not trust you?

    Can you tell when your provider does not trust you?

    January 18, 2026
    Do you believe national polls on health issues are accurate

    National health polls: trust in healthcare system accuracy?

    May 8, 2024
    Which health policy issues matter the most to Republican voters in the primaries?

    Which health policy issues matter the most to Republican voters in the primaries?

    May 14, 2024
    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    May 7, 2024
  • Courses
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
  • Official Learner
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
    How NADAC, WAC, and ASP Shape Drug Costs

    How NADAC, WAC, and ASP Shape Drug Costs

    April 20, 2026
    The Hidden Costs Employers Don’t See in Traditional Health Plans

    The Hidden Costs Employers Don’t See in Traditional Health Plans

    March 22, 2026
    The Impact of COVID-19 on Patient Trust

    The Impact of COVID-19 on Patient Trust

    March 3, 2026
    Debunking Myths About GLP-1 Medications

    Debunking Myths About GLP-1 Medications

    February 16, 2026
    The Future of LLMs in Healthcare

    The Future of LLMs in Healthcare

    January 26, 2026
    The Future of Healthcare Consumerism

    The Future of Healthcare Consumerism

    January 22, 2026
  • Surveys

    Surveys

    Public Perception of Peptide Regulation and Compounding Practices

    Public Perception of Peptide Regulation and Compounding Practices

    April 19, 2026
    Understanding of Clinical Evidence in Peptide and Hormone Use

    Understanding of Clinical Evidence in Peptide and Hormone Use

    March 30, 2026

    Survey Results

    Can you tell when your provider does not trust you?

    Can you tell when your provider does not trust you?

    January 18, 2026
    Do you believe national polls on health issues are accurate

    National health polls: trust in healthcare system accuracy?

    May 8, 2024
    Which health policy issues matter the most to Republican voters in the primaries?

    Which health policy issues matter the most to Republican voters in the primaries?

    May 14, 2024
    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    May 7, 2024
  • Courses
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
  • Official Learner
No Result
View All Result
Daily Remedy
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics & Law

Physician Advocacy Rings Hollow

Daily Remedy by Daily Remedy
August 24, 2021
in Politics & Law
0

In an era of corporatized healthcare, in which many physicians clamor to lead, there are but a few true leaders. Dr. Sachin H. Jain is one of those few. So when he writes, we read.

In the early days of summer he penned a piece advocating for a Civil Rights style movement in healthcare.

He called for the tent poles of healthcare to be replaced, touted income inequality as healthcare inequity, and criticized healthcare’s propensity towards aggressive, expensive treatments in favor of preventative care services.

He concluded with a series of platitudes calling for more common sense, employer health reform, and healthcare equality before ending with a plea for action – “find fundamental solutions”.

But to find fundamental solutions, we require fundamental thinking, or as Aristotle coined it, first principles thinking. We need to address the root causes that create the problems we all want to fix in healthcare.

This calls for a more abstract thinking, focusing less on healthcare disparities or inefficiencies in the healthcare systems, and more on the perceptions and beliefs that give rise to the disparities and inefficiencies in the first place.

“We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them”, said Albert Einstein. But to introduce new thinking into healthcare, as Dr. Jain said, we need more courage and imagination.

Two attributes in short supply in healthcare today.

Healthcare is mired in regulatory red tape, to where the regulations define healthcare itself. Herein lies the problem – and the solution.

To encourage fundamental solutions in healthcare, we must reduce the cost of errors and enable innovation. Healthcare has become risk adverse because the penalty for a mistake has become exceeding high.

We once touted evidence based medicine for the standards and protocols it offered healthcare. But those same data points and guidelines have now confined healthcare to the rubric of standardization.

Data has codified into law, and the art of medicine has transformed into the industry of healthcare liability.

In such an environment there is no room for courage and imagination. Instead we find risk adverse physicians-turned-consultants spewing jargon from the latest best-selling book.

If we truly want change in healthcare, then we must not only change the way we think, but make it easier to think differently.

The most powerful way to think differently in healthcare is through first principles thinking. Through such thinking we understand why diabetics remain noncompliant – despite the many anti-hyperglycemic medications and insulin formularies, and novel sensors that measure blood glucose in real time.

It is not the effectiveness of the treatment, but the perception of the treatment that matters to the patient – and what matters to patients is what matters in healthcare ultimately.

A principle we have lost in modern healthcare. By hiding behind the litigious veneer of modern healthcare, physicians have been disconnected from their patients.

We now need clinical studies to educate physicians on communication strategies for patients who are vaccine hesitant. We have the best healthcare technology, an efficient vaccine development and distribution system, yet we have only 51% of the population vaccinated – nearly nine months after the vaccine became available to the public.

This is not a disparity problem, nor an efficiency problem – it is a fundamental problem of thinking. Physicians and patients think about vaccine effectiveness and safety differently, yet neither understands that the other thinks differently, creating a conceptual divide between physicians and the patients they serve.

A divide that arose as physicians trained and practiced within a world of healthcare that rewarded certain ways of thinking and punished other ways. As a result, courage and imagination wither in favor of conformity and compliance.

In such a world, a call for physician advocacy in the vein of the Civil Rights movement risks becoming another hollow catchphrase to be coined among the physician-consulting class.

But if we are to remain true to Dr. Jain’s words, advocating for meaningful change in healthcare, then we need to first change how we think – and begin thinking in first principles.

ShareTweet
Daily Remedy

Daily Remedy

Dr. Jay K Joshi serves as the editor-in-chief of Daily Remedy. He is a serial entrepreneur and sought after thought-leader for matters related to healthcare innovation and medical jurisprudence. He has published articles on a variety of healthcare topics in both peer-reviewed journals and trade publications. His legal writings include amicus curiae briefs prepared for prominent federal healthcare cases.

Comments 0

  1. David Acevedo says:
    5 years ago

    Noooo, …a health care org that is doing ‘good’ (making money) would not want to divide its forces to help anyone, …no matter what. Liability attorneys and accountants are our ‘doctors’ now.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Videos

summary

An in-depth exploration of drug pricing, including key databases like NADAC, WAC, and ASP, and how they influence the pharmaceutical supply chain, policy, and patient advocacy. The episode also introduces MedPricer's innovative pricing intelligence platform, offering valuable insights for healthcare professionals, policymakers, and patients.

Chapters

00:00 Understanding Drug Pricing Dynamics
03:52 Exploring the Drug Pricing Database
10:07 Patient Advocacy and Drug Pricing
13:56 Market Intelligence in Drug Pricing
How NADAC, WAC, and ASP Shape Drug CostsDaily Remedy
YouTube Video X-Tfwy7XKEg
Subscribe

Policy Shift in Peptide Regulation

Clinical Reads

FDA Evaluation of Certain Bulk Drug Substances in Compounding: Clinical Interpretation

FDA Evaluation of Certain Bulk Drug Substances in Compounding: Clinical Interpretation

by Daily Remedy
April 19, 2026
0

Clinicians increasingly encounter patients using or requesting peptide-based therapies sourced through compounding pharmacies. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has identified a subset of bulk drug substances, including certain peptides, that may present significant safety risks when used in compounded formulations. The clinical question is whether these regulatory signals reflect meaningful patient-level risk and how they should influence prescribing behavior. This matters because compounded peptides often sit outside traditional approval pathways, creating uncertainty around quality, dosing consistency, and safety. Understanding...

Read more

Join Our Newsletter!

Twitter Updates

Tweets by TheDailyRemedy

Popular

  • Detecting Hospital M&A Synergies Before They’re Announced: A Rate-Based Event Strategy

    Detecting Hospital M&A Synergies Before They’re Announced: A Rate-Based Event Strategy

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • State Regulators and the Federal Data Gap: How MedPricer Fills What CMS Leaves Incomplete

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Employer-Sponsored Insurance Is Breaking Down. Price Data Tells You Where It’s Happening First.

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Importance of Access Control in the Workplace

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Transparency Paradox: Why Publishing Prices Can Raise Them

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • 628 Followers

Daily Remedy

Daily Remedy offers the best in healthcare information and healthcare editorial content. We take pride in consistently delivering only the highest quality of insight and analysis to ensure our audience is well-informed about current healthcare topics - beyond the traditional headlines.

Daily Remedy website services, content, and products are for informational purposes only. We do not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. All rights reserved.

Important Links

  • Support Us
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Join Our Newsletter!

  • Survey
  • Podcast
  • About Us
  • Contact us

© 2026 Daily Remedy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Surveys
  • Courses
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
  • Official Learner

© 2026 Daily Remedy