Thursday, December 7, 2023
ISSN 2765-8767
  • Survey
  • Podcast
  • Write for Us
Daily Remedy
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
    A conversation with Dr. Lewis, a Pain Specialist who has seen it all

    A conversation with Dr. Lewis, a Pain Specialist who has seen it all

    December 5, 2023
    A follow-on conversation with Drs. Lawhern & Nadeau, delving deeper into opioid mortality statistics

    A follow-on conversation with Drs. Lawhern & Nadeau, delving deeper into opioid mortality statistics

    December 3, 2023
    Joseph Parker

    A conversation with Dr. Parker, a model of physician advocacy

    December 2, 2023
    Dr. Amesh Adalja Discusses Flu Season and Trends in 2024

    Dr. Amesh Adalja Discusses Flu Season and Trends in 2024

    November 25, 2023
    Drs. Lawhern and Nadeau Explain Overdose Mortality Data

    Drs. Lawhern and Nadeau Explain Overdose Mortality Data

    November 23, 2023
    A conversation with Dr. Gavin Francis

    A conversation with Dr. Gavin Francis

    November 20, 2023
  • Surveys

    Surveys

    Should guided yoga and breathing exercise (pranayama) classes be covered by your health insurance?

    Should guided yoga and breathing exercise (pranayama) classes be covered by your health insurance?

    November 29, 2023
    How often do you distrust healthcare news

    How often do you distrust healthcare news?

    October 30, 2023

    Survey Results

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    October 16, 2022
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
    A conversation with Dr. Lewis, a Pain Specialist who has seen it all

    A conversation with Dr. Lewis, a Pain Specialist who has seen it all

    December 5, 2023
    A follow-on conversation with Drs. Lawhern & Nadeau, delving deeper into opioid mortality statistics

    A follow-on conversation with Drs. Lawhern & Nadeau, delving deeper into opioid mortality statistics

    December 3, 2023
    Joseph Parker

    A conversation with Dr. Parker, a model of physician advocacy

    December 2, 2023
    Dr. Amesh Adalja Discusses Flu Season and Trends in 2024

    Dr. Amesh Adalja Discusses Flu Season and Trends in 2024

    November 25, 2023
    Drs. Lawhern and Nadeau Explain Overdose Mortality Data

    Drs. Lawhern and Nadeau Explain Overdose Mortality Data

    November 23, 2023
    A conversation with Dr. Gavin Francis

    A conversation with Dr. Gavin Francis

    November 20, 2023
  • Surveys

    Surveys

    Should guided yoga and breathing exercise (pranayama) classes be covered by your health insurance?

    Should guided yoga and breathing exercise (pranayama) classes be covered by your health insurance?

    November 29, 2023
    How often do you distrust healthcare news

    How often do you distrust healthcare news?

    October 30, 2023

    Survey Results

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    October 16, 2022
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
No Result
View All Result
Daily Remedy
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncertainty & Complexity

Empathy Gaps, Moral Hazards

Jay K Joshi by Jay K Joshi
August 27, 2022
in Uncertainty & Complexity
0
Empathy Gaps, Moral Hazards

We have many successful physicians. But we have few who do right by their patients. The dichotomy is jarring.

It appears because healthcare suffers from moral hazards. The perverse incentives are everywhere. We pretend to ignore them. So instead of moral hazards, we say moral injury, or find some clever catchphrase to belie the truth. We claim physicians are suffering because they are overworked. But physicians have been working fewer hours decade over decade since the 1970s – though the relative time a physician spends on non-clinical tasks is increasing.

So, to be a great physician today, you must prioritize the system of healthcare over the individual patient. This is the dichotomy.

A decade ago, a successful physician saw as many patients as possible throughout the day, but spent hardly any time with any one patient. Today, a successful physician is one who best documents the patient encounter, jotting every phrase or code necessary to maximize the financial reimbursement. As a result, physicians went from treating patients bedside to essaying the most elaborate patient notes.

These are the symptoms of a system rife with moral hazards. We see it throughout healthcare. For any proposed solution, we find an ulterior motive. These are the on-ground realities of a healthcare system laced with questionable incentives. When hospitals began incurring penalties for readmissions, hospital leaders began changing the readmitting diagnoses.

No proposed solution, whether it is to improve outcomes or reduce costs, can work until we fix the moral hazard problem. It emerged when we transformed clinical medicine into a healthcare system. Out of that complexity formed a matrix of incentives. None of which are alone wrong, but when combined, produce recurring patterns of moral hazards.

Leaders in healthcare no longer respond to the intended effect of any policy. They react to the implicit moral hazards within it. While we may never find an exact solution, we can at least begin to address the matter with effective leadership.

Right now, these leaders lack the ability to guide because they have lost touch with the individual patient. We put too many degrees of separation between patients and health leaders.

The moral hazards appear within the separation. It explains why healthcare leaders prioritize reducing length of stay with little regard to the individual patient experience; why patients discharged with congestive heart failure suddenly get readmitted with acute respiratory distress. The leaders never see the patient; they only see the data points, and by proxy, the financials.

Data never convey empathy, so health leaders remain blind to it. They never see how financial decisions affect the patient experience. This underlies the network of moral hazards.

When we separate cause and effect, people lose sight of the consequences of their actions. Clinical decisions are not burdened by the weight of the outcomes. And without such anchoring, we lose sight of why we care for patients.

The solution, or at least the start to it, is not difficult: Fill the empathy gap by connecting cause and effect. Ensure patients and healthcare leaders interact over more than data-driven cash flow statements. A leader who sees the faces of patients affected by his or her policy will make decisions quite differently from someone who only sees the metrics.

Empathy is funny like that. We never notice it until it is long gone. Only then does it become apparent by what appears in its absence. As healthcare grew, it became more complicated. Eventually, it grew beyond the comprehension of any one person. This is when medicine became a healthcare system: a necessary change to accommodate the growing patient population and the influx of technology into medical care.

But now the system has grown beyond recognition. The incentives designed to make healthcare more efficient have created undue separations, disconnecting parts that were never meant to be split.

Within these crevices emerged the moral hazards, creating empathy gaps to fill the void.

It is time we acknowledge them in healthcare. So we may study the effects of empathy on patient care. Hopefully, we learn that it is more than an emotion derived from experience; it is the essence of good clinical care.

ShareTweet
Jay K Joshi

Jay K Joshi

Dr. Jay K Joshi serves as the editor-in-chief of Daily Remedy. He is a serial entrepreneur and sought after thought-leader for matters related to healthcare innovation and medical jurisprudence. He has published articles on a variety of healthcare topics in both peer-reviewed journals and trade publications. His legal writings include amicus curiae briefs prepared for prominent federal healthcare cases.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Videos

Dr. Adalja shares his thoughts on the current flu season and future trends in viral infectious diseases. He talks about vaccine misinformation and what he expects to see in 2024.

Dr. Adalja is a Senior Scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, an Adjunct Assistant Professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, and an Affiliate of the Johns Hopkins Center for Global Health. His work is focused on emerging infectious disease, pandemic preparedness, and biosecurity.

https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/who-we-are/our-people/amesh-adalja-md-fidsa

Twitter: @AmeshAA

Instagram: @ameshadalja


#COVID #RSV #influenza #misinformation #disinformation #vaccines #trust
Dr. Amesh Adalja Discusses Flu Season and Trends in 2024
YouTube Video rSipAzS4d90
Subscribe

How does Congress learn about health issues?

Visuals

A Two Headed Monster - State Attorneys General and the Drug Enforcement Agency

DEA driven production cuts of prescription opioids

by Jay K Joshi
November 15, 2023
0

We highlight a figure from patient advocate, Monty Goddard's article, A Two Headed Monster – State Attorneys General and the Drug Enforcement Agency.

Read more

Twitter Updates

Tweets by DailyRemedy1

Newsletter

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do

Popular

  • Unraveling How Patients Lose Credibility with Their Physicians

    Unraveling How Patients Lose Credibility with Their Physicians

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • A Call to Action for Pain Patients and Advocates

    1 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • A Two Headed Monster – State Attorneys General and the Drug Enforcement Agency

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Focusing on the Jury Instruction on Drug Conspiracy at My Trial

    1 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Healthcare is Health Justice

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • 628 Followers

Daily Remedy

Daily Remedy offers the best in healthcare information and healthcare editorial content. We take pride in consistently delivering only the highest quality of insight and analysis to ensure our audience is well-informed about current healthcare topics - beyond the traditional headlines.

Daily Remedy website services, content, and products are for informational purposes only. We do not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. All rights reserved.

Important Links

  • Support Us
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Newsletter

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do

  • Survey
  • Podcast
  • About Us
  • Contact us

© 2023 Daily Remedy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Surveys
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us

© 2023 Daily Remedy

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do