Tuesday, January 31, 2023
ISSN 2765-8767
  • Survey
  • Podcast
  • Write for Us
Daily Remedy
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, physician writer and emergency medicine physician

    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, writer and emergency medicine physician

    November 8, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    October 31, 2022
    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    October 23, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    October 23, 2022
  • Surveys

    Surveys

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    by Jay K Joshi
    December 12, 2022

    Survey Resutls

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    October 16, 2022
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, physician writer and emergency medicine physician

    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, writer and emergency medicine physician

    November 8, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    October 31, 2022
    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    October 23, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    October 23, 2022
  • Surveys

    Surveys

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    by Jay K Joshi
    December 12, 2022

    Survey Resutls

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    October 16, 2022
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
No Result
View All Result
Daily Remedy
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncertainty & Complexity

Declare Pandemic Uncertainty

Enough time has passed to where we are reflecting on the pandemic for a sense of closure.

Jay K Joshi by Jay K Joshi
November 14, 2022
in Uncertainty & Complexity
0
Declare Pandemic Uncertainty

Creative Commons

Some say we should declare amnesty. Others demand a mea culpa. Let’s forgo both and simply declare pandemic uncertainty. Acknowledge the vast unknown that surrounds everything we know in medicine.

It’s hard for us to understand uncertainty. We process it in stages. First comes the fear. The fear turns into anger and then we look for places to release that anger. That triggers the never ending blame game.

At the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, we watched our favorite restaurants shut down, small businesses either close or go under, and mortality inch upward. By focusing attention on the growing incidence of infections, we gave rise to a pandemic of fear that emerged alongside the actual virus. It turned a public health crisis into an existential crisis affecting every aspect of this country.

We looked for something or someone to blame. Some blamed the delayed response and insufficient resources, while others blamed the novelty of the virus and the unforeseen intensity.

Despite the wide-ranging interpretations and reactions, one trend seemed to hold true. A large population in a country would get infected, political leaders would get blamed, and then people started counting the lives – lives affected and lives lost.

The more we counted, the more we feared – soon the fear overtook our behavior. We began asking for more tests. We demanded them without realizing that regardless of the results, the treatment would be the same: quarantining. We clamored for tests even after knowing the results could be wrong.

We treated our fears like a symptom, right alongside cough and fever. By curing our fears, we acted as though we treated the virus. It was fear that led physicians to self-prescribe 55,000 scripts of hydroxychloroquine, forgoing medical ethics for the irrationality of fear.

Fears made worst case scenarios the likely scenarios leading cities to demand medical supplies and ventilators in excess of what COVID-19 models projected the cities would need. No one can say whether these reactions were an appropriate reaction or an overreaction. They’re a subjective reaction to the fear of uncertainty.

Uncertainties appear differently in the moment and after the fact. Studying the difference in these perceptions helps to understand how to approach similar uncertainties in the future. Demanding apologies or declaring all as forgiven misses the mark. It’s far more important to study our tendencies in an objective light, to make sense of why we behaved as we did. If we’re being honest, our collective reactions to the pandemic created as much harm as the pandemic itself. There’s no one to blame, only a need for self-analysis.

Milton Friedman alluded to this when he warned of overreactions in healthcare: “[the] cure is worse than the disease”.

Health policy experts reacted with extreme lockdowns, using fear as a tool to contain the virus. They didn’t think the public would understand the importance of quarantining or of behavioral modifications like mask wearing, so they told “noble lies”. The public saw fear as a mechanism of control and grew to mistrust policy-makers. Once the mistrust grew, the reactions became increasingly chaotic and self-destructive – from both the public and policy experts.

Frightened patients purchased test kits lacking FDA approval in large quantities online, bypassing all regulatory oversight designed to avoid clinically harmful behavior. But the public’s fear of the virus overtook any regard for the regulatory process, which ironically became mostly ineffective in the most critical of times.

What emerged instead were a series of reactions to facts as they emerged. We attributed cause and effect without knowing the full cause of the pandemic, and struggled to make sense of what was transpiring, even though we knew all the relevant facts had not yet fully appeared.

We saw this with the COVID-19 vaccines. Everyone had a view on vaccines, regardless of how much they knew about them. Each argument, no matter how eloquent, centered on individual rights versus collective benefits. Those for individual rights focused on the risk of receiving a vaccine injection. Those for collective safety focused on the risk of being infected by diseases the vaccine intends to protect against.

At face value, arguments on both sides are justified as they are both partially true: each vaccine injection carries an individual risk and vaccines in aggregate provide a collective benefit. Those who are against vaccines focus on the individual risk while those who are in favor focus on the widespread immunization. As uncertainty grows, mistrust grows along with it. So it makes sense that few trusted the vaccines at first. There was just too much uncertainty. In fact, we can trace the uncertainty over the pandemic and see how public perception of vaccines changed.

At first, public sentiment for vaccines was high because the vaccine was perceived to be a solution to COVID-19 in a broad, generalized sense. This perception changed when vaccines became available. It turned into an individual decision to get it or not. The perception changed because the uncertainty changed. Now, instead of looking at the vaccine as a general form of treatment, people viewed the vaccine relative to individual benefit and risk.

Our minds gravitate toward what we know. But our reactions are constantly in response to what we don’t know. Fear is funny like that. It ignores the facts and reacts to the uncertainty. And when the uncertainty changes, so do our perceptions.

This is nothing to be ashamed of, or to moralize upon after the fact. It is something to be studied absent any pretense of retroactive sanctimony.

We shouldn’t apologize for reacting to things we didn’t know about. Nor should we self-righteously forgive others for things they did in the grips of fear. We should absolve ourselves of this desire to characterize our behavior within the framework of an apology.

Uncertainty is one of the most difficult things for us to understand. Yet, it’s the most important thing to appreciate about the pandemic.

ShareTweet
Jay K Joshi

Jay K Joshi

Dr. Jay K Joshi serves as the editor-in-chief of Daily Remedy. He is a serial entrepreneur and sought after thought-leader for matters related to healthcare innovation and medical jurisprudence. He has published articles on a variety of healthcare topics in both peer-reviewed journals and trade publications. His legal writings include amicus curiae briefs prepared for prominent federal healthcare cases.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Videos

YouTube Video VVUxUDVQenU5RTFjUVFKNDY2ZlBmdFB3LmdVUm55WVpqRmNn This is a video about Elemental/Essential Frameworks of Healthcare Law

00:00 Elemental/Essential Frameworks of Healthcare Law
Load More... Subscribe

Expert vs. Lay Testimony

Visuals

NADAC (National Average Drug Acquisition Cost)

NADAC (National Average Drug Acquisition Cost)

by Jay K Joshi
January 29, 2023
0

We list the acquisition price of drugs that are covered under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program - effectively, how much does the government pay for common drugs utilized by patients on Medicaid. Drugs listed are from A-CH.  

Read more

Twitter Updates

Tweets by DailyRemedy1

Newsletter

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do

Popular

  • Letter to the Alabama Board of Medical Examiners

    Letter to the Alabama Board of Medical Examiners

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Malicious Prosecution and Fabrication of Evidence

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Prosecuting Doctors as Drug Dealers

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • My Respect for the Law

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Why Our Prescribing were for Patients’ Best Interests

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Daily Remedy

Daily Remedy offers the best in healthcare information and healthcare editorial content. We take pride in consistently delivering only the highest quality of insight and analysis to ensure our audience is well-informed about current healthcare topics - beyond the traditional headlines.

Daily Remedy website services, content, and products are for informational purposes only. We do not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. All rights reserved.

Important Links

  • Support Us
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Newsletter

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do

  • Survey
  • Podcast
  • About Us
  • Contact us

© 2023 Daily Remedy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Contrarian
    • Financial Markets
    • Innovations & Investing
    • Perspectives
    • Politics & Law
    • Trends
    • Uncertainty & Complexity
  • Podcasts
  • Surveys
    • Survey Results
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us

© 2023 Daily Remedy

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do