Monday, January 30, 2023
ISSN 2765-8767
  • Survey
  • Podcast
  • Write for Us
Daily Remedy
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, physician writer and emergency medicine physician

    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, writer and emergency medicine physician

    November 8, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    October 31, 2022
    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    October 23, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    October 23, 2022
  • Surveys

    Surveys

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    by Jay K Joshi
    December 12, 2022

    Survey Resutls

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    October 16, 2022
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, physician writer and emergency medicine physician

    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, writer and emergency medicine physician

    November 8, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    October 31, 2022
    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    October 23, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    October 23, 2022
  • Surveys

    Surveys

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    by Jay K Joshi
    December 12, 2022

    Survey Resutls

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    October 16, 2022
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
No Result
View All Result
Daily Remedy
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics & Law

X Marks the Spot

Don't expect much of anything to change.

Jay K Joshi by Jay K Joshi
January 15, 2023
in Politics & Law
0
X Marks the Spot

Eugenio

In healthcare, the most prominent effects of a new law or policy on patient behavior are seen in the unintended consequences. In late 2022, buried within the behemoth omnibus bill was the MAT Act, an overlooked rule that eliminates the X-waiver required of physicians prescribing certain substance use dependency medications, namely methadone and buprenorphine.

Whatever headlines the freshly minted act got framed it positively, as a means of increasing access to care for patients with substance use dependencies. Ostensibly, that’s true. Now any physician can prescribe opioid abuse medications, known more formally as partial opioid agonists.

But few physicians will actually prescribe buprenorphine or even methadone. They’re not looking at the clinical benefits of increasing access to care. They’re focused on the heightened legal liability of treating patients perceived to be high-risk by prescribing yet another controlled substance.

This is the unintended consequence. Lost in the ever growing calls for harm reduction therapy and access to care for patients with substance use dependencies is the even faster growing divide between the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA).

The NIH funds harm reduction. It advocates for increased access to care for patients with substance use dependencies. But the DEA maintains its supply side focus as its strategy to curb drug abuse. It looks at numbers, focusing on the quantity of drugs, and by extension, the quantity of opioid prescriptions – both opioid medications for pain and for opioid abuse.

We know which side is winning. Just look at the headlines. Every time a physician arrest makes the headlines, the articles include a corresponding number – usually of some purportedly reckless physician labeled as a high prescriber of opioids, as though the quantity of opioids prescribed alone justifies criminal sanctions.

Numbers have a funny way of showing only half-truths and, as we often see around opioid related narratives, full-on lies. Studies have repeatedly demonstrated no correlation between the number of opioid prescribed and opioid related mortality within a specific geographic region. It may sound sacrosanct, but targeting physicians who are dubbed as high prescribers doesn’t actually prevent opioid overdoses.

Particularly to the DEA, which, under the aegis of the Department of Justice (DOJ), has turned the war on drugs into an all-out assault on physicians. We see special law enforcement units, like the U.S. Attorney’s Office’s Opioid Task Force, roll out indictment, one after another, for the “purpose of combating the growing number of unlawful distributions of controlled substances fueling the nation’s opioid crisis.”

There’s no clinical basis to any of this, but that doesn’t stop the arrests. So now, every physician has a figurative sword of Damocles swirling above his or her head in every clinical encounter with a patient requiring opioids. Prescribe too many opioids and you’ll be taken down: This is the unwritten message.

In such a climate, why would a physician risk his or her career to provide medication for patients with substance use dependency? They wouldn’t. Sure, opioids are different from opioid abuse medications. Just like benzodiazepines are different from pain medications. But to the watchful eye of the DEA, the pharmacology of the drug matters less than the drug schedule.

This is the metric used by the DEA and DOJ to measure the risk of any medication. Schedule I drugs are the most dangerous, at least according to how the DEA defines danger, and drugs at higher schedules are deemed relatively less so.

If a physician were to start prescribing opioid abuse medications, they would be increasing the number of controlled substances prescribed. Buprenorphine is a Schedule III drug, considered commensurate with medications like Xanax. But methadone is a Schedule II drug, right there with other more common opioids like Norco and Percocet.

So theoretically, a physician may prescribe these medications to address a very real clinical need. But legally, the DEA and DOJ may perceive that physician to be high-risk due to the increased number of controlled substances prescribed. It doesn’t matter what is prescribed. In the eyes of the law, to be targeted by law enforcement, you simply need to prescribe a relatively high number of controlled substances. It comes down to numbers, particularly the number of Schedule II medications.

This sounds illogical, but what about the opioid epidemic has been logical so far? So while removing the X-waiver sounds good in concept. In practice, few physicians will begin to see patients requiring opioid abuse medications. For them, there’s too much legal risk.

ShareTweet
Jay K Joshi

Jay K Joshi

Dr. Jay K Joshi serves as the editor-in-chief of Daily Remedy. He is a serial entrepreneur and sought after thought-leader for matters related to healthcare innovation and medical jurisprudence. He has published articles on a variety of healthcare topics in both peer-reviewed journals and trade publications. His legal writings include amicus curiae briefs prepared for prominent federal healthcare cases.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Videos

YouTube Video VVUxUDVQenU5RTFjUVFKNDY2ZlBmdFB3LmdVUm55WVpqRmNn This is a video about Elemental/Essential Frameworks of Healthcare Law

00:00 Elemental/Essential Frameworks of Healthcare Law
Load More... Subscribe

Expert vs. Lay Testimony

Visuals

NADAC (National Average Drug Acquisition Cost)

NADAC (National Average Drug Acquisition Cost)

by Jay K Joshi
January 29, 2023
0

We list the acquisition price of drugs that are covered under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program - effectively, how much does the government pay for common drugs utilized by patients on Medicaid. Drugs listed are from A-CH.  

Read more

Twitter Updates

Tweets by DailyRemedy1

Newsletter

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do

Popular

  • Letter to the Alabama Board of Medical Examiners

    Letter to the Alabama Board of Medical Examiners

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Prosecuting Doctors as Drug Dealers

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Malicious Prosecution and Fabrication of Evidence

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Why Our Prescribing were for Patients’ Best Interests

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • My Respect for the Law

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Daily Remedy

Daily Remedy offers the best in healthcare information and healthcare editorial content. We take pride in consistently delivering only the highest quality of insight and analysis to ensure our audience is well-informed about current healthcare topics - beyond the traditional headlines.

Daily Remedy website services, content, and products are for informational purposes only. We do not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. All rights reserved.

Important Links

  • Support Us
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Newsletter

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do

  • Survey
  • Podcast
  • About Us
  • Contact us

© 2023 Daily Remedy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Contrarian
    • Financial Markets
    • Innovations & Investing
    • Perspectives
    • Politics & Law
    • Trends
    • Uncertainty & Complexity
  • Podcasts
  • Surveys
    • Survey Results
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us

© 2023 Daily Remedy

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do