Monday, January 30, 2023
ISSN 2765-8767
  • Survey
  • Podcast
  • Write for Us
Daily Remedy
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, physician writer and emergency medicine physician

    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, writer and emergency medicine physician

    November 8, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    October 31, 2022
    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    October 23, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    October 23, 2022
  • Surveys

    Surveys

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    by Jay K Joshi
    December 12, 2022

    Survey Resutls

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    October 16, 2022
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, physician writer and emergency medicine physician

    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, writer and emergency medicine physician

    November 8, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    October 31, 2022
    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    October 23, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    October 23, 2022
  • Surveys

    Surveys

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    by Jay K Joshi
    December 12, 2022

    Survey Resutls

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    October 16, 2022
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
No Result
View All Result
Daily Remedy
No Result
View All Result
Home Trends

Healthcare’s False Starts

Jay K Joshi by Jay K Joshi
September 6, 2022
in Trends
0
Healthcare’s False Starts

Healthcare is mired in a series of false starts. First it was the COVID-19 pandemic, then the vaccine roll-out, and now, the latest is monkey pox. It feels as though healthcare cannot help but get in its way, over and over.

We blame politicians. We blame policy. But in reality, we have no one to blame. These false starts are not some problem plaguing healthcare for which we have to find a solution. Rather, they are a feature.

Healthcare by nature is reactionary. We observe things over time and react to the changes iteratively. Rarely do we preemptively give medication for a disease that we have yet to diagnose. And when we do, we usually have a strong suspicion for what it could be, and we call it empirical treatment.

It is a fancy way of saying we make guesses based on what we see, what our experiences tell us. But this is a tricky game, because appearances can be deceiving, particularly in medicine. An initial presenting diagnosis may look one way, and then change, based on additional information gleaned either through clinical evaluation or additional testing.

Ultimately, it is the constellation of symptoms and signs that determine the diagnosis, which takes time to collect. But in the interval, while waiting for the information to present itself, we hedge toward what we think the diagnosis could be.

We hedge toward what we know. In medicine, this is considered good clinical practice. But nothing in medicine is entirely good or bad. And what can be good in one scenario can be quite the opposite in another. This overreliance on the familiar produces a bias, which we aptly name familiarity bias.

It is one of the most common cognitive biases affecting clinicians. We gravitate toward what we know until what we know becomes all there is to know. It is why patients with rare diseases are misdiagnosed at first. These patients go through a gauntlet of more common diagnoses with more common treatment options, until they all prove to be wrong.

This is familiarity bias manifesting over patient care. Eventually, we arrive at the right diagnosis and provide the correct treatment, but only after iteratively parsing through multiple clinical conditions. It is how healthcare works. It is the scientific method applied to clinical decision-making.

The problem comes when we apply this thinking to health policy. We forget that healthcare is not only a science, but an art as well. Or, as Sir William Osler, the progenitor of modern medicine would say, “a science of uncertainty and an art of probability”.

But we dislike uncertainty in health policy. We like quick fixes. They are politically advantageous and make for better public narratives. Just look at recent history. The first year of the COVID-19 pandemic coincided with the 2020 presidential election. Nothing health policy related was free of political implications. Every COVID projection, data point, or policy had some ramification on the pending election – and politicians distorted all things clinical to be politically favorable.

As a result, we saw a slew of narratives from various policy leaders with overt political agendas. Some decried the pandemic as a hoax, some said it was like a “bad case of the flu”, while others advocated for draconian lockdowns.

In hindsight, none of these narratives were entirely correct. Just like nothing in medicine is entirely correct or incorrect. Healthcare is a complex blend of changing information that dynamically shifts over time.

No single health policy is uniformly right all the time because such a concept does not exist in healthcare. No single narrative can ever be truly right from start to finish. More than anything else, these narratives are first impressions.

They are the initial thoughts a clinician has about a patient diagnosis before all the clinical information has materialized. But unlike clinicians who know they need more information, policy wonks touting these narratives never considered changing their tune as more information trickled in.

They sang the same song regardless of any new information or data. For them, whatever corroborates the initial belief is valid, and whatever refutes it is invalid. Through such thinking, we create selective echo chambers in which people with similar first impressions reiterate their preexisting beliefs, over and over.

But medicine is not designed to be reiterated like this. It is iterative, changing over time as we glean new information. And what is true for the individual patient remains true at the policy level. Only we like to believe it is not. Rather, those at the helm of health policy like to believe it is not.

They would rather stick with erroneous beliefs than admit they are unsure of what to do. So we have with multiple false starts based on incomplete first impressions.

ShareTweet
Jay K Joshi

Jay K Joshi

Dr. Jay K Joshi serves as the editor-in-chief of Daily Remedy. He is a serial entrepreneur and sought after thought-leader for matters related to healthcare innovation and medical jurisprudence. He has published articles on a variety of healthcare topics in both peer-reviewed journals and trade publications. His legal writings include amicus curiae briefs prepared for prominent federal healthcare cases.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Videos

YouTube Video VVUxUDVQenU5RTFjUVFKNDY2ZlBmdFB3LmdVUm55WVpqRmNn This is a video about Elemental/Essential Frameworks of Healthcare Law

00:00 Elemental/Essential Frameworks of Healthcare Law
Load More... Subscribe

Expert vs. Lay Testimony

Visuals

NADAC (National Average Drug Acquisition Cost)

NADAC (National Average Drug Acquisition Cost)

by Jay K Joshi
January 29, 2023
0

We list the acquisition price of drugs that are covered under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program - effectively, how much does the government pay for common drugs utilized by patients on Medicaid. Drugs listed are from A-CH.  

Read more

Twitter Updates

Tweets by DailyRemedy1

Newsletter

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do

Popular

  • Letter to the Alabama Board of Medical Examiners

    Letter to the Alabama Board of Medical Examiners

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Prosecuting Doctors as Drug Dealers

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Malicious Prosecution and Fabrication of Evidence

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Why Our Prescribing were for Patients’ Best Interests

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • My Respect for the Law

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Daily Remedy

Daily Remedy offers the best in healthcare information and healthcare editorial content. We take pride in consistently delivering only the highest quality of insight and analysis to ensure our audience is well-informed about current healthcare topics - beyond the traditional headlines.

Daily Remedy website services, content, and products are for informational purposes only. We do not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. All rights reserved.

Important Links

  • Support Us
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Newsletter

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do

  • Survey
  • Podcast
  • About Us
  • Contact us

© 2023 Daily Remedy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Contrarian
    • Financial Markets
    • Innovations & Investing
    • Perspectives
    • Politics & Law
    • Trends
    • Uncertainty & Complexity
  • Podcasts
  • Surveys
    • Survey Results
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us

© 2023 Daily Remedy

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do