Monday, January 30, 2023
ISSN 2765-8767
  • Survey
  • Podcast
  • Write for Us
Daily Remedy
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, physician writer and emergency medicine physician

    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, writer and emergency medicine physician

    November 8, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    October 31, 2022
    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    October 23, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    October 23, 2022
  • Surveys

    Surveys

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    by Jay K Joshi
    December 12, 2022

    Survey Resutls

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    October 16, 2022
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, physician writer and emergency medicine physician

    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, writer and emergency medicine physician

    November 8, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    October 31, 2022
    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    October 23, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    October 23, 2022
  • Surveys

    Surveys

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    by Jay K Joshi
    December 12, 2022

    Survey Resutls

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    October 16, 2022
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
No Result
View All Result
Daily Remedy
No Result
View All Result
Home Contrarian

Dialectic Medicine

Behavioral intervention has limited benefits because it doesn't address how patients think.

Jay K Joshi by Jay K Joshi
November 28, 2022
in Contrarian
0
Dialectical Medicine

David S. Soriano, Creative Commons

Dialectic is one of those words that’s used the most by those who hardly understand it. Even philosophers like Hegel struggled to explain it. To make matters worse, its meaning has shifted over the course of history as it found new purpose in new political movements.

The most famous of which, of course, is Communism. But dialectic thinking was used long before Karl Marx usurped the term to describe a socialist utopia. At its core, dialectic is a way of thinking about systems as cyclic patterns. That’s it. It can describe anything from religious beliefs to political identities. Ironically, in recent years, its application has overshadowed the actual method itself.

But dialectic thinking holds tremendous potential in improving our understanding of medicine, because it’s the ideal way to understand patient behavior. It explains why patient behavior is so hard to change and why we make unhealthy decisions despite knowing better.

We think in waves, oscillating between an idea, its opposite, and the application of that idea – only to then merge that applied idea with a new idea. On it goes. Suppose you’re at a friend’s New Year’s party. Everybody’s eating cake. You’re supposedly getting a head start on a New Year’s diet. You see the cake in front of you. You tell yourself not to eat it. You quickly remind yourself of how you skipped deserts at holiday parties throughout the month of December. You then contextualize the decision to eat cake relative to previous decisions not to eat poorly. You mix in thoughts about how your diet technically doesn’t start until the first of the year, which is still a few hours away. You blend your decision to eat or not to eat the cake in front of you with previous decisions where you ate well and pending decisions about how you assume you will eat in the future. After merging all of this together, you arrive at a decision to eat the cake. Congratulations, Mary Antoinette would be proud.

This is dialectic thinking. This is how we make clinical decisions regarding our health – most, if not all the time. It’s non-linear, irrational, and above all, decidedly dialectic.

It explains why traditional clinical interventions don’t work. We tried nudges. They became nuisances. We tried guidelines. They became a maze of revisions. None of these interventions work beyond a certain point because patient behavior, beyond a certain point, is dialectic.

It lives at the fringes of rational thought. This isn’t to despair patient behavior or cast aspersions about us as individuals. It’s an honest assessment of how we behave clinically.

Think about vaccine hesitancy and how pervasive it was during the pandemic – and how it’s still rampant among certain patient populations. The more providers tried to fight against hesitancy, to denounce it, the stronger it became. In many ways, the paternalistic approach to medicine – “I am your doctor, listen to me” – simply exacerbated vaccine hesitancy among the misinformation-weary masses.

But by acknowledging vaccine hesitancy, justifying the skepticism that many patients developed over the pandemic – “I know it’s hard to know what to trust” – it became easier to overcome vaccine hesitancy. This is dialectic thinking applied to patient behavior.

In the mind of a patient, there aren’t just two distinct decisions: to trust vaccines or to not trust vaccines. There are various gradations of beliefs that sift one way or another. A vaccine hesitant person may acknowledge the merits of the science behind vaccine technology, but may also think its side effects are consequential. Deciding whether to get a vaccine by comparing its benefits with its side effects appears logical. But those thoughts are also mired in the decision to trust or not to trust the vaccine based on the policy makers advocating for the vaccine.

It doesn’t seem logical that a patient would consider whether to trust vaccines by thinking about vaccine technology alongside public policy communication, but that’s the point of dialectic thinking. There’s no logic in the thoughts that appear. There are only fluctuating relationships among the thoughts that influence the final combination of beliefs that coalesce into a decision.

Trusting vaccines, therefore, is never only about the science or the political affiliations or America’s closet fascination with conspiracy theories. It’s a blend of all three patterns of thought, oscillating side by side until they synthesize into one coherent decision, unique to each individual.

Yet, healthcare providers only focus on the decision, not the process, so they fail to understand how patients think and lump them into convenient narratives – an educated patient or a vaccine denier.

Instead, providers should focus on how patients reach their conclusions, so they may have a better sense of how to intervene clinically. Providers can then focus on the patterns of thought and respond in ways that shift a patient’s thinking patterns toward healthy decisions. This would be more effective than traditional methods seen in clinical care.

ShareTweet
Jay K Joshi

Jay K Joshi

Dr. Jay K Joshi serves as the editor-in-chief of Daily Remedy. He is a serial entrepreneur and sought after thought-leader for matters related to healthcare innovation and medical jurisprudence. He has published articles on a variety of healthcare topics in both peer-reviewed journals and trade publications. His legal writings include amicus curiae briefs prepared for prominent federal healthcare cases.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Videos

YouTube Video VVUxUDVQenU5RTFjUVFKNDY2ZlBmdFB3LmdVUm55WVpqRmNn This is a video about Elemental/Essential Frameworks of Healthcare Law

00:00 Elemental/Essential Frameworks of Healthcare Law
Load More... Subscribe

Expert vs. Lay Testimony

Visuals

NADAC (National Average Drug Acquisition Cost)

NADAC (National Average Drug Acquisition Cost)

by Jay K Joshi
January 29, 2023
0

We list the acquisition price of drugs that are covered under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program - effectively, how much does the government pay for common drugs utilized by patients on Medicaid. Drugs listed are from A-CH.  

Read more

Twitter Updates

Tweets by DailyRemedy1

Newsletter

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do

Popular

  • Letter to the Alabama Board of Medical Examiners

    Letter to the Alabama Board of Medical Examiners

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Prosecuting Doctors as Drug Dealers

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Malicious Prosecution and Fabrication of Evidence

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Why Our Prescribing were for Patients’ Best Interests

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • My Respect for the Law

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Daily Remedy

Daily Remedy offers the best in healthcare information and healthcare editorial content. We take pride in consistently delivering only the highest quality of insight and analysis to ensure our audience is well-informed about current healthcare topics - beyond the traditional headlines.

Daily Remedy website services, content, and products are for informational purposes only. We do not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. All rights reserved.

Important Links

  • Support Us
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Newsletter

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do

  • Survey
  • Podcast
  • About Us
  • Contact us

© 2023 Daily Remedy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Contrarian
    • Financial Markets
    • Innovations & Investing
    • Perspectives
    • Politics & Law
    • Trends
    • Uncertainty & Complexity
  • Podcasts
  • Surveys
    • Survey Results
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us

© 2023 Daily Remedy

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do