Tuesday, January 31, 2023
ISSN 2765-8767
  • Survey
  • Podcast
  • Write for Us
Daily Remedy
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, physician writer and emergency medicine physician

    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, writer and emergency medicine physician

    November 8, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    October 31, 2022
    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    October 23, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    October 23, 2022
  • Surveys

    Surveys

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    by Jay K Joshi
    December 12, 2022

    Survey Resutls

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    October 16, 2022
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    A conversation with Dr. Selwyn O. Rogers, trauma surgeon and gun policy expert

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    A conversation with Dr. Kyle Fischer, policy director for the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention

    November 25, 2022
    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, physician writer and emergency medicine physician

    A conversation with Dr. Edwin Leap, writer and emergency medicine physician

    November 8, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    A conversation with Mr. Omar M Khateeb, innovator in medical device sales

    October 31, 2022
    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    A conversation with Miss Smriti Kirubanandan, passionate healthcare strategist

    October 23, 2022
    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    A conversation with Mr. Michael Johnson, legal expert in physician contracts

    October 23, 2022
  • Surveys

    Surveys

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    by Jay K Joshi
    December 12, 2022

    Survey Resutls

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    October 16, 2022
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
No Result
View All Result
Daily Remedy
No Result
View All Result
Home Trends

Biased Coverage of Gun Violence

The journalistic format misrepresents the full story of those involved.

Jay K Joshi by Jay K Joshi
November 7, 2022
in Trends
1
Biased Coverage of Gun Violence

Start with a few introductory words and then drop the quotation. That’ll hook them.

For journalists covering gun violence, time is of the essence. Get to the scene, find some sources, get quotations from both sides – whatever that means – and blend it all together. It’s all so formulaic.

It makes for great journalism. But it’s bad for those covered in the stories. The long-held belief in journalism was that a great piece had to tell a concise story the reader can latch onto. Journalists labored over the by-lines, crafted the opening words, and used brief paragraphs – all to create a quick, enjoyable read.

There’s a limit to how much you can do that when the story is anything but concise. For stories at the intersection of health and violence, the more concise we make them, the more inaccurate and harmful they become.

In journalism, being concise means the story is easy to understand. It creates familiar patterns for the reader to consume. Behavioral economists would describe the way journalists format these stories as a type of heuristic, an established thought pattern that we naturally default toward. Heuristics help us make decisions by simplifying broad information into default tendencies or responses. When we rely on heuristics, we get the fastest solution, but not necessarily the best one.

They’re an evolutionary legacy of time when we had to rapidly process our environment. It’s great for survival, but less so when analyzing something complex like gun violence. But somehow, they’re firmly indoctrinated in how journalists write about it. As a result, we see this formula for covering gun violence appear repeatedly – all coming out of a need to create content that the reader can latch onto and digest as quickly as possible.

It creates a contradiction between traditional principles of journalism and the accurate reporting of gun violence. The better we craft a story in the traditional journalistic mold, the more likely it is to spread misinformation by reinforcing erroneous but pervasive beliefs about gun violence.

Take sourcing as an example. Where do most reporters go? To local law enforcement, who hastily piece together notes to arrive at the most straightforward account of what transpired. Their perspectives are biased because the information is limited.

But the story must go on. So journalists are left to make do with whatever they can get, biased as it may be, connecting incomplete bits of knowledge like lost jigsaw puzzle pieces. Only to then add an additional veneer of bias by contorting that information into the journalistic framework.

They identify two sides to the story. They frame acts of violence into perpetrators and victims. This breaks down along lines defined by who provides the most information, which often makes law enforcement the protagonist, and makes the recalcitrant witnesses nameless bystanders.

The perpetrators and victims mold into caricatures of a story line, reduced to moments in time when the bullets left their guns or entered their bodies. Their stories are told by those moments and the characterizations of the sources.

This strikes at the heart of the problem in how we cover gun violence: what we know is not the full story. We know the power of silence in communities of color affected by gun violence. As the saying goes – even if you see something, you didn’t see something. Yet it’s within the silence where we find the full story.

The ones most affected by gun violence are the main characters in these stories. They aren’t defined in the acute moments of violence. Their stories begin long before and will continue long after. But the readily available information describes the violence quickly and simply, and then everyone moves on. The stories are now frozen in these moments of time, detailing life altering tragedies in a timeframe of seconds. But the participants continue to live their story, long after the news cycle finishes trending.

For them, their stories of violence are also stories of lost opportunity, broken family structure, and misguided anger. There are no sides, only the ongoing struggle of violence and welfare. These aren’t concise stories. They don’t fit any set heuristic and certainly don’t fit the modern journalistic framework.

That’s the point. The traditional journalistic format doesn’t work for stories on gun violence. We need articles that make us pause and feel a sense of empathy for those involved. There may not be a hook, but there’ll be a better understanding of gun violence.

ShareTweet
Jay K Joshi

Jay K Joshi

Dr. Jay K Joshi serves as the editor-in-chief of Daily Remedy. He is a serial entrepreneur and sought after thought-leader for matters related to healthcare innovation and medical jurisprudence. He has published articles on a variety of healthcare topics in both peer-reviewed journals and trade publications. His legal writings include amicus curiae briefs prepared for prominent federal healthcare cases.

Comments 1

  1. Brian Lynch says:
    3 months ago

    Thanks

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Videos

YouTube Video VVUxUDVQenU5RTFjUVFKNDY2ZlBmdFB3LmdVUm55WVpqRmNn This is a video about Elemental/Essential Frameworks of Healthcare Law

00:00 Elemental/Essential Frameworks of Healthcare Law
Load More... Subscribe

Expert vs. Lay Testimony

Visuals

NADAC (National Average Drug Acquisition Cost)

NADAC (National Average Drug Acquisition Cost)

by Jay K Joshi
January 29, 2023
0

We list the acquisition price of drugs that are covered under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program - effectively, how much does the government pay for common drugs utilized by patients on Medicaid. Drugs listed are from A-CH.  

Read more

Twitter Updates

Tweets by DailyRemedy1

Newsletter

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do

Popular

  • Letter to the Alabama Board of Medical Examiners

    Letter to the Alabama Board of Medical Examiners

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Malicious Prosecution and Fabrication of Evidence

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Prosecuting Doctors as Drug Dealers

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • My Respect for the Law

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Why Our Prescribing were for Patients’ Best Interests

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Daily Remedy

Daily Remedy offers the best in healthcare information and healthcare editorial content. We take pride in consistently delivering only the highest quality of insight and analysis to ensure our audience is well-informed about current healthcare topics - beyond the traditional headlines.

Daily Remedy website services, content, and products are for informational purposes only. We do not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. All rights reserved.

Important Links

  • Support Us
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Newsletter

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do

  • Survey
  • Podcast
  • About Us
  • Contact us

© 2023 Daily Remedy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Contrarian
    • Financial Markets
    • Innovations & Investing
    • Perspectives
    • Politics & Law
    • Trends
    • Uncertainty & Complexity
  • Podcasts
  • Surveys
    • Survey Results
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us

© 2023 Daily Remedy

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do