Friday, February 20, 2026
ISSN 2765-8767
  • Survey
  • Podcast
  • Write for Us
  • My Account
  • Log In
Daily Remedy
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
    Debunking Myths About GLP-1 Medications

    Debunking Myths About GLP-1 Medications

    February 16, 2026
    The Future of LLMs in Healthcare

    The Future of LLMs in Healthcare

    January 26, 2026
    The Future of Healthcare Consumerism

    The Future of Healthcare Consumerism

    January 22, 2026
    Your Body, Your Health Care: A Conversation with Dr. Jeffrey Singer

    Your Body, Your Health Care: A Conversation with Dr. Jeffrey Singer

    July 1, 2025

    The cost structure of hospitals nearly doubles

    July 1, 2025
    Navigating the Medical Licensing Maze

    The Fight Against Healthcare Fraud: Dr. Rafai’s Story

    April 8, 2025
  • Surveys

    Surveys

    How Confident Are You in RFK Jr.’s Health Leadership?

    How Confident Are You in RFK Jr.’s Health Leadership?

    February 16, 2026
    AI in Healthcare Decision-Making

    AI in Healthcare Decision-Making

    February 1, 2026

    Survey Results

    Can you tell when your provider does not trust you?

    Can you tell when your provider does not trust you?

    January 18, 2026
    Do you believe national polls on health issues are accurate

    National health polls: trust in healthcare system accuracy?

    May 8, 2024
    Which health policy issues matter the most to Republican voters in the primaries?

    Which health policy issues matter the most to Republican voters in the primaries?

    May 14, 2024
    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    May 7, 2024
  • Courses
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
  • Official Learner
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
    Debunking Myths About GLP-1 Medications

    Debunking Myths About GLP-1 Medications

    February 16, 2026
    The Future of LLMs in Healthcare

    The Future of LLMs in Healthcare

    January 26, 2026
    The Future of Healthcare Consumerism

    The Future of Healthcare Consumerism

    January 22, 2026
    Your Body, Your Health Care: A Conversation with Dr. Jeffrey Singer

    Your Body, Your Health Care: A Conversation with Dr. Jeffrey Singer

    July 1, 2025

    The cost structure of hospitals nearly doubles

    July 1, 2025
    Navigating the Medical Licensing Maze

    The Fight Against Healthcare Fraud: Dr. Rafai’s Story

    April 8, 2025
  • Surveys

    Surveys

    How Confident Are You in RFK Jr.’s Health Leadership?

    How Confident Are You in RFK Jr.’s Health Leadership?

    February 16, 2026
    AI in Healthcare Decision-Making

    AI in Healthcare Decision-Making

    February 1, 2026

    Survey Results

    Can you tell when your provider does not trust you?

    Can you tell when your provider does not trust you?

    January 18, 2026
    Do you believe national polls on health issues are accurate

    National health polls: trust in healthcare system accuracy?

    May 8, 2024
    Which health policy issues matter the most to Republican voters in the primaries?

    Which health policy issues matter the most to Republican voters in the primaries?

    May 14, 2024
    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    May 7, 2024
  • Courses
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
  • Official Learner
No Result
View All Result
Daily Remedy
No Result
View All Result
Home Featured

Political Bias Affects Nursing Decisions

Nurses’ attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination are influenced by partisanship.

Filip Viskupič by Filip Viskupič
December 3, 2022
in Featured
0
Political Bias Affects Nursing Decisions

Creative Commons

The big idea

Children of nurses who identify as Republican are less likely to receive a COVID-19 vaccination compared with children of nurses who identify as Democrat, according to our recently published study in the Journal of Community Health.

We surveyed more than 1,000 nurses in South Dakota in June and July of 2022. Of those, 298 participants reported having children 5 to 17 years old. We asked this group about the vaccination status of their children and found that the children of nurses who identified as Democrats had a 13% higher probability of being vaccinated compared with the offspring of nurses who identified as Republican.

The timing of our survey only allowed us to measure the vaccination intention of parents of children from 6 months to 4 years old, since authorization of COVID-19 vaccines for that age group occurred just days before the survey. Of the 123 nurses who reported having children 6 months to 4 years old, those who identified as Democrats had a 14% higher probability of intending to vaccinate their children compared to self-identified Republicans.

Additionally, we found that those nurses who received a COVID-19 booster dose were more likely to vaccinate their children. On the other hand, gender, education and type of nursing credential had no effect.

Why it matters

Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccination for children has been a contentious issue. In our study, we found that polarization among nurses split along political party lines in a similar fashion to the general public.

Despite the wide availability of safe and free COVID-19 vaccines for children and adolescents in the U.S., vaccination rates for people under age 18 are lower than for adults. As of Nov. 30, 2022, more than 60% of children remain unvaccinated.

Though children tend to be more resilient to COVID-19, there are still significant risks. The Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention has reported more than 1,500 deaths of children under 18 from COVID-19, as of late November 2022. And children are susceptible to “long” COVID symptoms as well.

Nurses – and other health care workers – are at the forefront of efforts to contain COVID-19. They also advise patients who are deciding whether to vaccinate themselves and their families. Our study shows that among nurses, political partisanship appears to influence their attitudes toward vaccinating their own kids.

Public health officials are striving to boost COVID-19 vaccination rates. Yet the politicization of the pandemic continues to hinder these efforts.

Two nurse protesters stand near a street holding up signs arguing against vaccine mandates, with a large group of protesters in the background.
Nurses protesting the Biden administration’s vaccine mandate, which has since been suspended, in Michigan in July 2021.
SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

Increasing vaccination rates among children will also protect the most vulnerable members of society, such as older adults and people with weakened immune systems. Nevertheless, some parents continue to resist vaccinating their children.

Our study shows that parents make COVID-19 vaccination decisions for the entire family. We found that nurses who received a booster dose of a COVID-19 vaccine are more likely to vaccinate their children and adolescents. However, the nurses who haven’t received a booster dose are far less likely to vaccinate their children.

What other research is being done

Our findings align with other research carried out by ourselves and others that shows the strong influence of partisan self-identification on COVID-19 attitudes and behaviors.

Other studies we’ve done show that Republicans are less likely than Democrats to receive a COVID-19 vaccination and are less likely to support mandatory COVID-19 vaccination. We also found that nurses who identify as Republican are less likely to receive a COVID-19 booster dose.

Our study joins a growing body of work that seeks to explore the factors behind COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among health care workers. Other studies have linked race and ethnicity, as well as trust in government, physicians and pharmaceutical companies, to the attitudes of health care workers toward COVID-19 vaccination.

What’s next

Given the politicization of the pandemic and the erosion of trust in authorities, it’s important that messages encouraging the vaccination of children come from trusted sources.

Our previous research suggests that religious leaders can help encourage compliance with COVID-19 prevention measures. In the future, we plan to investigate whether endorsements from trusted community leaders could convince parents to vaccinate their children.

Filip Viskupič, Assistant Professor of Political Science, South Dakota State University and David Wiltse, Associate Professor of Political Science, South Dakota State University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Source: The Conversation
ShareTweet
Filip Viskupič

Filip Viskupič

Dr. Filip Viskupič is an Assistant Professor of Political Science in the School of American and Global Studies and a Research Associate in The SDSU Poll at South Dakota State University. Dr. Viskupič earned his Ph.D. from the University of Georgia in 2019. His research is interdisciplinary in scope and lies at the intersection of political science, psychology, and public health.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Videos

This conversation focuses on debunking myths surrounding GLP-1 medications, particularly the misinformation about their association with pancreatic cancer. The speaker emphasizes the importance of understanding clinical study designs, especially the distinction between observational studies and randomized controlled trials. The discussion highlights the need for patients to critically evaluate the sources of information regarding medication side effects and to empower themselves in their healthcare decisions.

Takeaways
GLP-1 medications are not linked to pancreatic cancer.
Peer-reviewed studies debunk misinformation about GLP-1s.
Anecdotal evidence is not reliable for general conclusions.
Observational studies have limitations in generalizability.
Understanding study design is crucial for evaluating claims.
Symptoms should be discussed in the context of clinical conditions.
Not all side effects reported are relevant to every patient.
Observational studies can provide valuable insights but are context-specific.
Patients should critically assess the relevance of studies to their own experiences.
Engagement in discussions about specific studies can enhance understanding

Chapters
00:00
Debunking GLP-1 Medication Myths
02:56
Understanding Clinical Study Designs
05:54
The Role of Observational Studies in Healthcare
Debunking Myths About GLP-1 Medications
YouTube Video DM9Do_V6_sU
Subscribe

2027 Medicare Advantage & Part D Advance Notice

Clinical Reads

BIIB080 in Mild Alzheimer’s Disease: What a Phase 1b Exploratory Clinical Analysis Can—and Cannot—Tell Us

BIIB080 in Mild Alzheimer’s Disease: What a Phase 1b Exploratory Clinical Analysis Can—and Cannot—Tell Us

by Daily Remedy
February 15, 2026
0

Can lowering tau biology translate into a clinically meaningful slowing of decline in people with early symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease? That is the practical question behind BIIB080, an intrathecal antisense therapy designed to reduce production of tau protein by targeting the tau gene transcript. In a phase 1b program originally designed for safety and dosing, investigators later examined cognitive, functional, and global outcomes as exploratory endpoints. The clinical question matters because current disease-modifying options primarily target amyloid, while tau pathology tracks...

Read more

Join Our Newsletter!

Twitter Updates

Tweets by TheDailyRemedy

Popular

  • The Prevention Gap in Dementia Care

    The Prevention Gap in Dementia Care

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Healthcare Natural Rights

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Healthcare in Space

    1 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Heat Safety Tips Every Pregnant Mother Should Know

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Tapping Into the Mind Body Connection

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • 628 Followers

Daily Remedy

Daily Remedy offers the best in healthcare information and healthcare editorial content. We take pride in consistently delivering only the highest quality of insight and analysis to ensure our audience is well-informed about current healthcare topics - beyond the traditional headlines.

Daily Remedy website services, content, and products are for informational purposes only. We do not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. All rights reserved.

Important Links

  • Support Us
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Join Our Newsletter!

  • Survey
  • Podcast
  • About Us
  • Contact us

© 2026 Daily Remedy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Surveys
  • Courses
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
  • Official Learner

© 2026 Daily Remedy