Friday, March 24, 2023
ISSN 2765-8767
  • Survey
  • Podcast
  • Write for Us
Daily Remedy
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
    A conversation with Kristen Ogden, patient advocate for Dr. David Bockoff

    A conversation with Kristen Ogden, patient advocate for Dr. David Bockoff

    March 19, 2023
    Analyzing opioid prescribing trends with Mr. Jacob James Rich

    Analyzing opioid prescribing trends with Mr. Jacob James Rich

    March 19, 2023
    A conversation with Dr. John Whyte, author of Take Control of Your Heart Disease Risk

    A conversation with Dr. John Whyte, author of Take Control of Your Heart Disease Risk

    March 19, 2023
    We catch up with Dr. Linda Cheek to glean her thoughts on the DEA's continuing encroachment into healthcare in a post-Ruan world.

    Catching up with Dr. Linda Cheek, founder of Doctors of Courage

    March 19, 2023
    A conversation with Dr. Radhika Sharma, physician influencer and life coach

    A conversation with Dr. Radhika Sharma, physician influencer and life coach

    February 18, 2023
    A conversation with Dr. Alin Gragossian, physician and heart transplant survivor

    A conversation with Dr. Alin Gragossian, physician and heart transplant survivor

    February 13, 2023
  • Surveys

    Surveys

    Does inflation affect your spending

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    by Jay K Joshi
    March 8, 2023

    Survey Resutls

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    October 16, 2022
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
  • Shop DME
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
    A conversation with Kristen Ogden, patient advocate for Dr. David Bockoff

    A conversation with Kristen Ogden, patient advocate for Dr. David Bockoff

    March 19, 2023
    Analyzing opioid prescribing trends with Mr. Jacob James Rich

    Analyzing opioid prescribing trends with Mr. Jacob James Rich

    March 19, 2023
    A conversation with Dr. John Whyte, author of Take Control of Your Heart Disease Risk

    A conversation with Dr. John Whyte, author of Take Control of Your Heart Disease Risk

    March 19, 2023
    We catch up with Dr. Linda Cheek to glean her thoughts on the DEA's continuing encroachment into healthcare in a post-Ruan world.

    Catching up with Dr. Linda Cheek, founder of Doctors of Courage

    March 19, 2023
    A conversation with Dr. Radhika Sharma, physician influencer and life coach

    A conversation with Dr. Radhika Sharma, physician influencer and life coach

    February 18, 2023
    A conversation with Dr. Alin Gragossian, physician and heart transplant survivor

    A conversation with Dr. Alin Gragossian, physician and heart transplant survivor

    February 13, 2023
  • Surveys

    Surveys

    Does inflation affect your spending

    Does inflation affect how you use your deductible?

    by Jay K Joshi
    March 8, 2023

    Survey Resutls

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    October 16, 2022
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
  • Shop DME
No Result
View All Result
Daily Remedy
No Result
View All Result
Home Featured

To Coerce a Plea

But what I believe matters less than what they interpreted.

Jay K Joshi by Jay K Joshi
February 1, 2023
in Featured
1
To Coerce a Plea

Joan Wong for NBC News / Getty Images

My decision to enter a plea bargain never felt like a real decision, but instead a foregone conclusion. Though hardly ever stated explicitly, the understanding was that if I were indicted by a grand jury, then it was presumed I did something wrong. Under that perception, the indictment was not an opportunity to explain and defend myself, but a tragedy to accept and mourn. Any attempt to fight the inevitable was considered merely a stage in the grieving process.

I felt trapped and manipulated, my ability to defend myself weakened as my legal options dwindled to nothing but inaction. I felt defiance and disgust that my identity, as a physician, as a person, could so quickly give way to extremism engulfed and defined me. Soon enough, any attempt to justify or rationalize was met with tacit silence, pressed lips, and expressive eyes balancing sorrow and condemnation. Perception became my harsh new reality, defined by the prosecutor, who selectively created the impressions needed to obtain his desired outcome.

The prosecutor obtained a grand jury indictment by focusing publicly and overtly on the undercover agent’s visits as well as the actions and perjured statements of my medical assistant. To coerce a plea agreement, he impressed upon me directly and covertly the regulatory violations of the collaborative agreements I had used in the patient transitions. He claimed the regulatory policies could be considered criminal, and that he would superimpose additional charges if I were not to plead guilty.

Two separate legal strategies, one public, the other private, one to indict, the other to convict through plea—this was the prosecutor’s desired intent from the outset. The pressure to enter into a plea bargain grew heavier with every article, every motion, every misrepresentation gone unchecked, and every legal interpretation twisted and perpetuated, until I stagnated into a state of helplessness, weighing whatever limited options I had left.

After my indictment, I thought, naively, that I could resolve the matter like I had resolved other issues in my clinic, through open and honest communication. I called the police station, where I had been detained, to schedule a meeting to speak with the Munster police officer leading their opioid awareness initiatives. Surprisingly, he invited me to meet later that day.

We discussed the clinic, the quality model, strategies for patient care, and opportunities for physicians and police officers to work together in managing high-risk patients. We spent a significant amount of time discussing how trust in the clinical setting is essential for high-quality, cost-effective medicine. The meeting went well, and the officer invited me to future community events. I left the meeting, feeling content, decidedly confident that the officer had the right impression of me.

Then my phone rang.

My attorney blasted me for doing something apparently so reckless, so foolhardy, that to the interpretive eyes of the prosecutor must have been an attempt to manipulate the police to my advantage. I quickly realized there were no upcoming events or collaborations; there was only the legal case and its interpretations. From then on, I knew the die had been cast. The stain of criminality had left an indelible impression that could never be removed as long as the legal proceedings went on.

At that point, defiance became delusion, and I was left with no legal recourse and no ability to speak the truth. I stopped fighting. Anger became arrogance, so I stopped getting angry. Sadness gave way to acceptance, and I agreed to accept the plea agreement.

My eyes grew heavy under a lingering shame that overtook my face whenever I looked at my wife and now six-month-old son, feeling the sorrow of unconditional support in every broken smile.

My mind never agreed to what my hand eventually signed. I never believed I’d committed a crime over the course of patient care, and to be honest, I believe I was entrapped. Entrapment consists of two parts: inducement and predisposition. Inducement is when law enforcement directly forces a person to commit a crime, and predisposition is when the government influences a person to behave out of character, thereby committing a crime. How is this anything but an attempt to induce me into a crime? When no crime could be induced, law enforcement imposed intense pressure that led to administrative oversights in the collaborative agreements.

I provided good care to a patient who claimed to have a history of leg pain and behaved as if he were a compliant patient. He was agreeable to lowering his pain medication and to imaging studies once his insurance coverage was activated. This led me to believe he was a patient with legitimate medical issues.

The prosecutor argued that prescribing any opioid medication was illegal, and that by trusting the patient, I violated the law by violating my duty as a physician. He cited the phrase that represents a physician’s civic duty: “Do no harm.” Prosecutors and DEA agents take this phrase and interpret it to mean any prescription they believe is medically unnecessary is immediately illegal, regardless of context. In my case, they used the phrase to imply that I blindly trusted an undercover agent by prescribing medication based on his presenting symptoms rather than requiring verification before prescribing any medication. They turned my trust of a patient into a criminal act.

Blind trust is irresponsible and simply bad medicine. However, so is immediately distrusting and requiring the patient to verify medical conditions before treatment is administered. In finding a balance in trusting and verifying, I performed my duty to someone I had every reason to believe had legitimate medical conditions.

I believe I chose the right balance of verification and trust. I believe I was induced. But what I believe matters less than what they interpreted. And that made all the difference.

Burden of Pain
Cover of Burden of Pain
ShareTweet
Jay K Joshi

Jay K Joshi

Dr. Jay K Joshi serves as the editor-in-chief of Daily Remedy. He is a serial entrepreneur and sought after thought-leader for matters related to healthcare innovation and medical jurisprudence. He has published articles on a variety of healthcare topics in both peer-reviewed journals and trade publications. His legal writings include amicus curiae briefs prepared for prominent federal healthcare cases.

Comments 1

  1. Brian Lynch says:
    3 weeks ago

    Thank you.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Videos

YouTube Video VVUxUDVQenU5RTFjUVFKNDY2ZlBmdFB3LlRycG1TYWRHYVhB We speak with Mr. Jacob James Rich, who wrote an article in Reason Magazine - The Fight To Criminalize Opioid Prescribing - which provides a synopsis of his seminal work published in the Yale Law & Policy Review Inter Alia.

We discuss the article in depth, gleaning important insights on how opioid data is mischaracterized to arrive at contrived narratives of physician over-prescribing.

Mr. Jacob James Rich is a researcher at the Cleveland Clinic Center for Value-Based Care Research, a Ph.D. student at the Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, and a policy analyst at Reason Foundation.

https://reason.com/2023/02/10/the-fight-to-criminalize-opioid-prescribing/

https://ylpr.yale.edu/inter_alia/misinformed-misguided-prescription-abuse-prevention-act-response-delfino

#opioid #epidemic #data #fallacy
Load More... Subscribe

Expert vs. Lay Testimony

Visuals

NADAC (National Average Drug Acquisition Cost)

NADAC (National Average Drug Acquisition Cost)

by Jay K Joshi
January 29, 2023
0

We list the acquisition price of drugs that are covered under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program - effectively, how much does the government pay for common drugs utilized by patients on Medicaid. Drugs listed are from A-CH.  

Read more

Twitter Updates

Tweets by DailyRemedy1

Newsletter

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do

Popular

  • Media Sensationalism in the Opioid Epidemic

    Media Sensationalism in the Opioid Epidemic

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • My Plight as an Abandoned Pain Patient

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • In Support of IL HB 2046

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Thank you, AHCJ!

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Narratives on the Opioid Crisis

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Daily Remedy

Daily Remedy offers the best in healthcare information and healthcare editorial content. We take pride in consistently delivering only the highest quality of insight and analysis to ensure our audience is well-informed about current healthcare topics - beyond the traditional headlines.

Daily Remedy website services, content, and products are for informational purposes only. We do not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. All rights reserved.

Important Links

  • Support Us
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Newsletter

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do

  • Survey
  • Podcast
  • About Us
  • Contact us

© 2023 Daily Remedy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Surveys
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
  • Shop DME

© 2023 Daily Remedy

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do