Thursday, June 26, 2025
ISSN 2765-8767
  • Survey
  • Podcast
  • Write for Us
  • My Account
  • Log In
Daily Remedy
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
    Navigating the Medical Licensing Maze

    The Fight Against Healthcare Fraud: Dr. Rafai’s Story

    April 8, 2025
    Navigating the Medical Licensing Maze

    Navigating the Medical Licensing Maze

    April 4, 2025
    The Alarming Truth About Health Insurance Denials

    The Alarming Truth About Health Insurance Denials

    February 3, 2025
    Telehealth in Turmoil

    The Importance of NIH Grants

    January 31, 2025
    The New Era of Patient Empowerment

    The New Era of Patient Empowerment

    January 29, 2025
    Physicians: Write Thy Briefs

    Physicians: Write thy amicus briefs!

    January 26, 2025
  • Surveys

    Surveys

    Perception vs. Comprehension: Public Understanding of the 2025 MAHA Report

    Perception vs. Comprehension: Public Understanding of the 2025 MAHA Report

    June 4, 2025
    Understanding Public Perception and Awareness of Medicare Advantage and Payment Change

    Understanding Public Perception and Awareness of Medicare Advantage and Payment Change

    April 4, 2025

    Survey Results

    Do you believe national polls on health issues are accurate

    National health polls: trust in healthcare system accuracy?

    May 8, 2024
    Which health policy issues matter the most to Republican voters in the primaries?

    Which health policy issues matter the most to Republican voters in the primaries?

    May 14, 2024
    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    May 7, 2024
  • Courses
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
  • Official Learner
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
    Navigating the Medical Licensing Maze

    The Fight Against Healthcare Fraud: Dr. Rafai’s Story

    April 8, 2025
    Navigating the Medical Licensing Maze

    Navigating the Medical Licensing Maze

    April 4, 2025
    The Alarming Truth About Health Insurance Denials

    The Alarming Truth About Health Insurance Denials

    February 3, 2025
    Telehealth in Turmoil

    The Importance of NIH Grants

    January 31, 2025
    The New Era of Patient Empowerment

    The New Era of Patient Empowerment

    January 29, 2025
    Physicians: Write Thy Briefs

    Physicians: Write thy amicus briefs!

    January 26, 2025
  • Surveys

    Surveys

    Perception vs. Comprehension: Public Understanding of the 2025 MAHA Report

    Perception vs. Comprehension: Public Understanding of the 2025 MAHA Report

    June 4, 2025
    Understanding Public Perception and Awareness of Medicare Advantage and Payment Change

    Understanding Public Perception and Awareness of Medicare Advantage and Payment Change

    April 4, 2025

    Survey Results

    Do you believe national polls on health issues are accurate

    National health polls: trust in healthcare system accuracy?

    May 8, 2024
    Which health policy issues matter the most to Republican voters in the primaries?

    Which health policy issues matter the most to Republican voters in the primaries?

    May 14, 2024
    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    How strongly do you believe that you can tell when your provider does not trust you?

    May 7, 2024
  • Courses
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
  • Official Learner
No Result
View All Result
Daily Remedy
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics & Law

Imprisoned Physician Targeted for Treating Opioids Gets New Trial

The Supreme Court ruling has begun to protect physicians, though the media might not want to believe it

Joseph Parker, MD by Joseph Parker, MD
February 7, 2024
in Politics & Law
0
Imprisoned Physician Targeted for Treating Opioids Gets New Trial

Rodion Kutsaiev

“A Virginia doctor who prescribed more than 500,000 opioid doses in less than two years had his conviction and 40-year prison sentence thrown out by a federal appeals court on Friday…”, reads the headline of an NPR reporter.  This is the case of Dr. Joel Smithers, and the headline might as well read, “Pain Physician Treated Pain with Pain Medications!”.  I wrote a previous article about how the DEA is misleading news outlets that seem completely uninterested in facts these days, and I would like to bring your attention to this problem.

First, how did Dr. Smithers get convicted and sentenced to forty years?  Do you understand what carpet bombing is? Carpet bombing is where you bomb an entire area hoping to hit something important.  In this case, they brought 861 federal drug charges against the doctor, with only one count of possessing with the intent to distribute a controlled substance.  The rest are all related to prescribing a controlled medication “outside the usual practice of medicine” and for a “legitimate medical purpose.”  What does that mean? No one knows.  The US Supreme Court admitted they didn’t know and then demonstrated that lack of knowledge by asking what the “opiate speed limit” was during the Ruan case. Asking essentially, what’s the legal limit a doctor can prescribe?

The answer is, as given by Dr. Xiulu Ruan’s attorney, there is no legal limit.  It’s like having a nice highway with no speed limit signs, with drivers told to maintain a safe speed.  What’s a safe speed?  We’ll let you know if you exceed it. Then, allowing every prosecutor to order the arrest of anyone driving down the road under the claim that their speed was unsafe.  Expert witnesses would be purchased to tell the jury that 50 was much too fast in the early morning hours when people are sleepy, and 40 is too fast at night for drivers because they haven’t had enough carrots (Walmart receipts entered into evidence), while others are allowed to go past at 90, depending on the prosecutor’s “discretion.”  So, how much medication did Dr. Smithers prescribe?

500.000 “opioid doses,” according to the article.  Let’s assume here that they mean morphine dose equivalents, which, as anyone who has read my article knows, is not equivalent to a dose of morphine.  As a matter of fact, ten milligrams of morphine IV would be a common starting dose for moderate to severe pain; GoodRX only lists 15 and 30mg oral tablets, so let’s look at 15mg doses. That would be 33,333 pills. Over a period of two years, let’s assume five days a week with two weeks off, giving us 250 office days per year, so we are dividing that by 500, giving us 66.7 pills per workday.  We’ll go with 69, not to make Elon Musk happy but because it is easily divisible by 3 for TID dosing.  That gives us an average of 23 patients per day.  In an eight-hour day with thirty minutes for lunch, that would be over 15 minutes per patient.  19.6 minutes, in fact. Granting that most doctors work more than eight-hour days, and specialists often see people for follow-up appointments in less than ten minutes, this does not seem excessive.

Who is Dr. Smithers?  Dr. Joel Smithers is an osteopathic physician practicing pain and neuromuscular medicine.  He was registered under the  204D00000X as a Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine and OMM Physician. OMM stands for Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine.  For my fellow MDs, that’s when the DO school teaches you some chiropractic techniques.  He was licensed in both Virginia and West Virginia and graduated from the Lincoln Memorial University DeBusk College of Osteopathic Medicine in 2012.  According to scope of practice documents, he had treated addiction as well as pain.

The article goes on to say that “Overprescription of painkillers is one of the main causes of the nation’s opioid crisis. Nearly 645,000 people died in the United States from overdoses involving opioids from 1999 to 2021…” That is a misleading statement.  Opioids smuggled into the country through border checkpoints while the federal government was failing at its responsibilities are the cause of about 75% of those deaths, with fentanyl causing the numbers to skyrocket. You can read a great article on this here.

The original article reports that Dr. Smither’s office was raided in 2017 because “Smithers did not accept insurance and took in over $700,000 in cash and credit card payments prior to a search warrant being executed at his office…” Ok.  So, like half of psychiatrists and many other doctors, he chose not to take insurance. Since when did that become a crime?  And $700,000 over what period of time? One year?  Overhead averages around 60% of most clinic’s gross income, according to 99MGT. The remaining $280,000 is not an unreasonable salary for someone who spent about 23 years in school, 11 of those as an adult while everyone else was getting paid.

The article goes on to say that “Some traveled ‘hundreds of miles’ to visit Smithers to get their “drugs,” and, “… a few patients came from Tennessee because Tennessee had shut down some clinics as well.” Here, fellow physicians are important points.  Every pain or addiction clinic shutdown causes dozens of primary care doctors to stop treating pain and addiction, requiring the medical refugees of the DEA war on physicians to travel greater distances.  Setting up any doctor who agrees to care for those patients for prosecution. And that brings us back to courts allowing prosecutors to call any doctor a “pill mill.”  I have an article on that, too.

Testimony by Dr. Smither’s supporters was heard also, including that he “…was proud of being a doctor and frequently spoke of his desire to help others.”  But that was not able to compete with patients who were probably caught selling their medications and were trying to throw their doctor under the bus to get a lighter sentence.  One of them said that he was addicted to oxycodone and hydrocodone and that, “…there wasn’t no doctors in my area like that to see.”  What was meant by that, I have no idea. The original article on his conviction ends with, “According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, more than 700,000 people died in the United States from drug overdoses between 1999 and 2017, including 70,000 in 2017 alone. Of those 2017 deaths, the CDC said nearly 68% were linked to a prescription or illicit opioid.”  Note the subtle misdirection. “…linked to a prescription OR illicit opioid. “ Tarring the doctor with the stigma of the opioid crisis.

On  September  12,  2017,  a  grand jury indicted  Joel  Smithers on one count of possession of a  controlled substance with intent to distribute,  in violation of  21  U.S.C.  §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C).  J.A. 101.  Over the course of the next year, the government filed two superseding indictments.  The first added 715 counts:  one count of maintaining a place for the purpose of unlawful distribution, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 856, and 714 counts of unlawful dispensing and distributing of a controlled substance.  J.A. 102–03.  The second superseding indictment added 146 counts of unlawful dispensing and distributing.  J.A. 130–31.    The  latter  counts  were  charged  under  21  U.S.C.  § 841(a)(1),  which  (in  addition  to  criminalizing  possession  with  intent  to  dispense  or  distribute)  provides  that,  “[e]xcept  as  authorized . . . , it [is] unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally . .  .  to manufacture, distribute, or dispense . .   . a controlled substance.”  The statute does not define “authorized.”  Instead, Drug Enforcement Agency regulations define it:  a prescription is only authorized when  “issued for  a  legitimate  medical  purpose by  an  individual  practitioner  acting  in  the  usual course of his professional practice.”  21 C.F.R. §  1306.04 ”

Read that one more time. The statute does not define “authorized.”  Instead, Drug Enforcement Agency regulations define it.

Dr. Smithers was convicted on all counts and sentenced to the same maximum as would someone living in the state of Virginia who, in a fit of rage,  lost their temper and beat someone to death with a hammer, second-degree murder. For which the maximum sentence would have been forty years.  Now that conviction has been overturned, with the appellate court stating, “Joel Smithers, until this prosecution a doctor of osteopathy, was convicted on 861 counts, all related to his opioid-prescription practices.  He was sentenced to a total of 480 months in prison.  After his conviction, the Supreme Court, in Ruan v. United States, 597 U.S.  450 (2022), clarified the mens rea required to convict someone of unauthorized dispensing or distributing of a  controlled substance.   Because Ruan makes clear that Smithers’ jury instructions misstated  the  law, and because the misstatements  were not harmless error, we vacate the convictions and remand to the district court for a new trial.”

ShareTweet
Joseph Parker, MD

Joseph Parker, MD

Dr. Parker's journey began with four years of dedicated service in the U.S. Marine Corps, where he earned accolades such as the Meritorious Unit Citation and Good Conduct Medal. His exceptional dedication led to acceptance into the U.S. Air Force Officer Training School and a subsequent role as a Minuteman II ICBM Commander within U.S. Space Command, earning further recognition, including the Presidential Unit Citation, National Defense Service Medal, and the Air Force Achievement Medal. Transitioning into the medical field, Dr. Parker pursued studies at Mayo Medical School and joined the U.S. Medical Corps, ultimately achieving the rank of captain. Specializing in emergency medicine, he served as director of emergency medicine at two hospitals and founded an emergency medicine contracting company to save a foundering hospital from closure. He now speaks out as an advocate for physicians and patients and embodies a rare blend of scientific expertise, military leadership, and medical acumen, contributing significantly to the advancement of space exploration and the betterment of human health and safety.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Videos

Summary

In this episode of the Daily Remedy Podcast, Dr. Joshi discusses the rapidly changing landscape of healthcare laws and trends, emphasizing the importance of understanding the distinction between statutory and case law. The conversation highlights the role of case law in shaping healthcare practices and encourages physicians to engage in legal advocacy by writing legal briefs to influence case law outcomes. The episode underscores the need for physicians to actively participate in the legal processes that govern their practice.

Takeaways

Healthcare trends are rapidly changing and confusing.
Understanding statutory and case law is crucial for physicians.
Case law can overturn existing statutory laws.
Physicians can influence healthcare law through legal briefs.
Writing legal briefs doesn't require extensive legal knowledge.
Narrative formats can be effective in legal briefs.
Physicians should express their perspectives in legal matters.
Engagement in legal advocacy is essential for physicians.
The interpretation of case law affects medical practice.
Physicians need to be part of the legal conversation.
Physicians: Write thy amicus briefs!
YouTube Video FFRYHFXhT4k
Subscribe

MD Angels Investor Pitch

Visuals

Official MAHA Report

Official MAHA Report

by Daily Remedy
May 31, 2025
0

Explore the official MAHA Report released by the White House in May 2025.

Read more

Twitter Updates

Tweets by DailyRemedy1

Newsletter

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do

Popular

  • When Bats Whisper MERS: The Silent Mutations Pushing a New Coronavirus Toward Humans

    When Bats Whisper MERS: The Silent Mutations Pushing a New Coronavirus Toward Humans

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Swipe, Dab, Repeat: How TikTok Turned Skin Care into Science Fiction

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Re-Engineering Hope: Triple-Threat Immunotherapy Takes On Glioblastoma

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • When Cutting Calories Cuts Too Deep: Dieting’s Hidden Toll on Male Mental Health

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Hidden Boomerang: How Cipro and Its Cousins Super-Charge Superbugs

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • 628 Followers

Daily Remedy

Daily Remedy offers the best in healthcare information and healthcare editorial content. We take pride in consistently delivering only the highest quality of insight and analysis to ensure our audience is well-informed about current healthcare topics - beyond the traditional headlines.

Daily Remedy website services, content, and products are for informational purposes only. We do not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. All rights reserved.

Important Links

  • Support Us
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Newsletter

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do

  • Survey
  • Podcast
  • About Us
  • Contact us

© 2025 Daily Remedy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Surveys
  • Courses
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Support Us
  • Official Learner

© 2025 Daily Remedy

Start your Daily Remedy journey

Cultivate your knowledge of current healthcare events and ensure you receive the most accurate, insightful healthcare news and editorials.

*we hate spam as much as you do